I hope to use this little space as a sounding board to voice my political "opinion", about the gradual but steady dissolving of the constitution of the United States of America. I would also like to bring governance back to "WE THE PEOPLE" and away from greedy politicians who care only about lining their own pockets and ignoring the voice of "WE THE PEOPLE" that they have been elected to represent.
Rmember this?
Monday, December 28, 2015
Saturday, December 26, 2015
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
This is a copy and paste of an open letter to the Attorney General of the United States of America, Loretta Lynch. I wish I had written this.
Open letter to AG Loretta Lynch: Respectfully, take your ‘greatest fear’ and shove it
The following is an open letter to U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch:
Ms. Lynch I write this letter knowing it is far too late for your boss but praying that by some miracle you can still be reached.
On Wednesday, 14 Americans died at the hands of radical Muslims who pledged allegiance to theIslamic State rather than to the United States of America.
A day after that attack in San Bernardino, California you said your “greatest fear” was anti-Muslim speech that led to violence or “violent talk.”
“I think it’s important that as we again talk about the importance of free speech we make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not America,” you said in front of a room full of Muslims. “They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”
Go ahead and prosecute. Perhaps then a court can teach what freedom of speech means and how you and your boss cannot override it at your whim.
And please don’t do what the president does so often and tell us who we are and who we aren’t.
We are a people who won’t allow you take away the First and Second Amendments.
I know that President Obama doesn’t particularly care about the Constitution, but allow me to explain those amendments to you.
Not only does the First Amendment allow Muslims to practice their religion freely but it also gives every American the right to openly speak out against that religion, or anything else they choose.
The Founders put the Second Amendment in place because their “greatest fear” was an administration like yours who would take the First Amendment , and other freedoms, away from us.
And our “greatest fear,” unlike your fear of anti-Muslim speech, is a clear and present danger to our way of life.
We fear an administration that either doesn’t understand the Constitution or believes it doesn’t apply to them.
We fear Sharia law coming to the United States.
You know, things like not being allowed to insult Islam or Muslims. The things you threatened to prosecute and persecute Americans for.
Mainly, however, what we fear is a government so inept, so incompetent and useless that they cannot adequately protect us in a time of war.
A government that continues to allow entry to people from the same region as those who have vowed to annihilate us.
And while I’m against you prosecuting people based on speech – a clear violation of the Constitution – if you insist on doing so please allow me to help you.
If it is hate speech and violent talk you are looking for Ms. Lynch, a veritable treasure trove of such incendiary speech can be found at many mosques across America.
You may want to start there.
This article was posted: Monday, December 7, 2015 at 8:24 am
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Friday, October 9, 2015
More Gun Control. Really?
I just want to sound off a little bit. I’ll start by saying very simply that this is
still the United States of America. That
“WE THE PEOPLE” are still the first and last branch of the “Government.” That the government must “govern by the consent
of the governed”, that being “WE THE PEOPLE.” If the people do not consent to what the government
is doing, the government is not PERMITTED to continue down that particular
path. That the Constitution is NOT a
living document it is the final Document and the “Supreme law of the land.” It is a contract, legal and binding and goes
along with “citizenship” and it is meant exactly as such. In simpler terms, it is akin to a set of
directions that you would get with any product you buy. Right out of the box there is a set of
instructions on both how to use what you have just purchased as well as how to
assemble the final product for its intended use. There-in will almost always come a legal
disclaimer saying something to the effect that any unintended use of this
product will void the warranty or subject the user to legal action and/or void
of the warranty and sometimes both. The
same thing goes with the Constitution. If you violate the Constitution or the bill of
rights there is a penalty and/or a fine that will be (but in this day and age
never is) imposed. There is a “right” way and a wrong (“left” or progressive)
way to use (not interpret) the Constitution.
The right way is to treat it as it was meant to be treated, as the
“Supreme law of the land.” The wrong way
is to treat it as a living document that is subject to change on a whim, or
willy-nilly, or that it can be changed whenever someone with enough political
clout (Executive orders issued by the President) or money (large corporations
who write the laws and lobby Congress to pass them) sees fit so long as it fits
their agenda or their lifestyle. This
“document” was never intended to be subject to interpretation or to the will of
the minority, it is what it is. It was
however intended for a religious people, a moral people. If you want to change the configuration of
the document there is even a set of instructions for how you MUST do that. It cannot simply be done without forethought
but only with the will of the majority.
It cannot be done out of political correctness or for one’s own personal
belief or lifestyle. There is a specific
and prescribed procedure for any change to it.
In fact it is the law of the land.
This must be followed under the penalty of doing otherwise. So it is written, so must it be done. To do
otherwise is unlawful and potentially treasonous.
The Constitution
sets forth exactly how the government is to be set up as well as what it can’t
do (the “can’t is intended) for the people.
It was very carefully crafted by some very intelligent and knowledgeable
people. Then there were the people back then, in the beginning that were on the
fence and wouldn’t sign onto it without the bill of rights, or the promise
there-of. So, in 1789 it was finished
complete with the “bill of rights.” So
let’s dive into a couple of these enumerated rights shall we? I want to start by pointing out the ninth (9th)
amendment. This one is very often
overlooked but very important. This one
says: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Basically, what is being said here is that
just because we wrote these (ten at that time) down doesn’t mean there aren’t any
more. They are just too numerous to
mention one-by-one. Have you figured out
where I am going with this yet? Probably
not but let’s continue.
Let’s take the
obvious two amendments, the 1st and the 2nd. We’ll save the others for another day as this
could wind up being a book.
The 1st
amendment says; “Congress shall make no law respecting an ESTABLISHMENT of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and
to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
This is where I get to ask some specific questions that
pertain to our political or intellectual climate of today. Like; 1) “where in there does it say that
there is a separation of church and state”?
The frank, upfront
and HONEST answer is that it doesn’t say that anywhere in there. Nor does it say that anywhere in the
Constitution prior to the bill of rights.
The quoted statement above is nothing more than propaganda pushed by the
progressive (and dare I say, communist) agenda.
That argument is completely fallacious and in the words of Hitler “If
you make a lie big enough and continue repeating it long enough, the people
will come to believe it.” Every time you
here that little piece of malarkey, just remember it is right out of the
communist playbook.
2) Where in there
does it mention “free speech zones”?
The answer is it doesn’t.
Why? The answer is; because the
entire country and all of its publicly held land is a free speech zone. It doesn’t say that a permit is
required. Or that you can’t have
opposing free speech in the same space.
Nor does it say that you have the right not to be OFFENDED by said
speech.
3) Where in there
does it say that you have no right to free speech in a public venue, or a
political arena? The answer is
NOWHERE. Do you see any exclusion in
there as to what you can say, when you can say it, or who can or cannot be
there when you choose to speak? The
answer again is nope.
4) What about the
press? Does it say where they can or
cannot go? No. So why are they impeded? Hmm.
Maybe there are some things they don’t want the people to know. Could that be it?
5) How do you “petition
the government for a redress of grievances”?
The answer is; in this day and age you don’t. You can’t go to the Whitehouse. You can’t protest on the mall without fear of
arrest without a permit (there we go again).
And you darn sure don’t want to open your face around, near or within
earshot of anyone in political office without risking deportation or
imprisonment, so I guess that’s out altogether isn’t it?
The 2nd
amendment which says; “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the
security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall
not be infringed.”
As I see it, this is
very straight forward. There are no
ands’, no ifs and no but’s. The word
“SHALL” is even used to signify finality.
Yet our benevolent government has seen fit to slowly and methodically
chip away at this amendment since shortly after the assassination of President
Garfield on July 2nd 1881 when the very first gun laws were put on the
books. The first violation of this
amendment came unopposed. Though I don’t
see it mentioned here, this is a pretty good time line of additional
violations. http://www.infoplease.com/spot/guntime1.html.
With all that being
said let me conclude by saying that we are slowly but surely heading down that
very same road that we fought so hard to overcome in the 1700’s. Tyranny, it is right here before your eyes,
all you need to do to see it is open them and be willing to accept what you see
for what it is. It comes in many colors
and with many faces, but it is here none-the-less. I have only covered the first two amendments
here but there are many, many more I will cover in subsequent articles. The original fight started with brave men
having had enough. Drawing their line in
the sand at a small bridge in Yorktown, Pa. now known as the shot heard ‘round
the world. Where, or better even still,
when is your Yorktown moment. Or don’t
you have one?
Sunday, September 20, 2015
Monday, September 7, 2015
Liberty's Torch: The Rule Of Law In America: An Autopsy
Liberty's Torch: The Rule Of Law In America: An Autopsy: For our lead-in, here’s WeirdDave at Ace’s Place: What idea was the cornerstone of the ideological wall that the Founding Father...
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Monday, July 20, 2015
Friday, June 26, 2015
TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE
Today, Friday 26 June 2015, The Supreme Court of the United
States (SCOTUS) has just sealed our fate as a Nation. This morning, the nine (in)justices on the
panel decided in a 5-4 decision that the Constitution for the United States of
America, under the 14th amendment makes same sex marriages legal in
all 50 states. In so doing, the “Supreme”
court has decided to come out of the
closet. Stepping (finally) into the
light to reveal for all to see what they and this government really are and
finally state openly how it really works in this country. That
MANS’ law is the supreme law of the land and that our Judeo-Christian heritage as
well as our founding was inconsequential of this/them/their laws. The laws of God and of Nature (natural/common
law) have been abrogated. They could
have, and more than likely should have gone with the 10th amendment
(states’ rights) and left the decision as to whether or not to allow this abomination
to take place entirely up to the individual and sovereign states to decide on
their own what is to be done on this issue.
This, at least, would have taken the decision away from the Federal or
National government (they never had the power “Constitutionally” or otherwise
to make) and made the states responsible for their own actions. This might have deferred the Lords judgement
to the individual states (I said “May”) but Instead, in all their infinite
wisdom, they have decided to make it a “National” decision, one that will now
be considered to have been made by all of us as a Country, as a Nation, as a
People, as a whole. And as such WE THE PEOPLE, once again have
been subverted by the government that was once created to be for, of, and by
the People. Our Government, an AMERICAN
Government, a Republic (not a Democracy) was set up for the sole purpose of
doing only a few things on its own. The
power of this government was severely limited in both scope and power on
purpose, because WE THE PEOPLE were the government, and those who
we elected to serve us within the government would take their orders from the
people. Now sadly, they have affirmed
that it is firmly the other way around.
The People of this once great Nation are now (and haven’t been for a
long time) no longer the “Sovereign”. We
are now the servants (surfs) of an all-powerful fascist dictatorship, WE THE
PEOPLE have effectively and methodically been re-enslaved. For our complicity in this now affirmed
action our last vestiges of freedom, our birthright, our heritage and our
culture will now be completely destroyed.
The only thing that will change about this process will be the speed and
the openness our new form of government will use to completely wipe out what
remains of the old Republic. That is the
best part, the good news as-it-were.
The bad news is
that in a bold and blatant act of defiance to God and the Republic our new self-
appointed Government has forced all of us to face the coming judgement and
wrath of God. The day of reckoning is
upon us all. Though it is said that “only
the Father shall know the day and the hour” the signs are all before us. It is up to the church now. They must be and remain defiant of this
amoral dictatorship and finally stand for the truth. They must leave their precious 501-c (3) and
their love of money and go back to preaching the word of GOD. They must join together and stand as one in
the final battle for freedom and the restoration of God and Natures law. Only when this happens (or more appropriately
IF this happens) can we ever hope to avoid the coming “hell on earth”. If we ever hope to regain the Republic and
take back our liberty we must first as a Nation get back to and get right with
GOD. The founders of this once great
Nation said “with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we
mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” If we ever hope to regain any of those things
as a country and a people, we MUST work hard and together to defeat the
unrelenting work and reverse the 100 yrs. of progress (ives) made by these
Godless and Evil people who control this once great Nation and the land of the
free. May the Lord have mercy on us. Oh, and
by-the-way, if this offends anyone, it may be that it’s too late for you anyhow
and too bad.
This insert is taken from NEWSMAX with a link to the article there. These are quotes form Justice Scalia who wrote a scathing decent on the decision to day. Here are the quotes (via Newsmax):
Scalia's dissent was among the strongest:
"The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me," he wrote. "It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. Until the courts put a stop to it, public debate over same-sex marriage displayed American democracy at its best."
"But the Court ends this debate, in an opinion lacking even a thin veneer of law," Scalia argued. "Buried beneath the mummeries and straining-to-be-memorable passages of the opinion is a candid and startling assertion: No matter what it was the People ratified, the Fourteenth Amendment protects those rights that the Judiciary, in its 'reasoned judgment,' thinks the Fourteenth Amendment ought to protect."
Scalia took the harshest tones against the majority:
"The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic," he writes. "If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I ever joined an opinion for the Court that began: 'The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity,' I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.
"And to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation," he argued. "But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/scalia-dissents-gay-marriage/2015/06/26/id/652358/#ixzz3eCQgVniG
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
This insert is taken from NEWSMAX with a link to the article there. These are quotes form Justice Scalia who wrote a scathing decent on the decision to day. Here are the quotes (via Newsmax):
Scalia's dissent was among the strongest:
"The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me," he wrote. "It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. Until the courts put a stop to it, public debate over same-sex marriage displayed American democracy at its best."
"But the Court ends this debate, in an opinion lacking even a thin veneer of law," Scalia argued. "Buried beneath the mummeries and straining-to-be-memorable passages of the opinion is a candid and startling assertion: No matter what it was the People ratified, the Fourteenth Amendment protects those rights that the Judiciary, in its 'reasoned judgment,' thinks the Fourteenth Amendment ought to protect."
Scalia took the harshest tones against the majority:
"The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic," he writes. "If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I ever joined an opinion for the Court that began: 'The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity,' I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.
"And to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation," he argued. "But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/scalia-dissents-gay-marriage/2015/06/26/id/652358/#ixzz3eCQgVniG
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Sunday, June 7, 2015
IS THE MODERN MILITIA MOVEMENT A VIABLE OPTION
image courtesy of google
I was a United
States Navy Hospital Corpsman for a time.
The training I received in the Navy was incredible and very useful to me
both in my service to my Country and in my civilian life. I later became a Paramedic and served the
civilian sector both in the hospital setting and on the streets. I have taught classes as an instructor as
well. As a Corpsman, I didn’t receive a
lot of weapons training, or get a lot of battlefield tactics and/or tactical
movement instruction, but what training I did get in this area I found very
interesting and quite useful later on.
The reason I go into all of this in the beginning of this little
dissertation is to give you a brief history and a little background for where
my conclusions will be coming from in this article. Furthermore, I will state briefly my
frustration with “Geopolitics”, the election process, our elected officials and
the corruption that is all invasive within the current system as it has morphed
into over the last 100 or so years. The
lies, the deceit and the un-willingness of our Government and our elected officials
to follow and adhere to the Constitution for the United States I find very
disturbing to me at my very core. More-so,
I find the apathy or ignorance of the American people to what is going on all
around us simply unforgivable in most instances. There are a couple of terms I can use here i.e.:
“Useful Idiots”, Sheeple, willfully ignorant and so forth. I will even throw in “Cognitive dissonance”
just to add a technical term. I tried
for a time to get my neighbors (although few and far between) to get together
and form a type of preparedness group, or neighborhood protection force if you
will. They all acted as though I were
crazy and blew me off with no interest in even a way of keeping in touch like
radio or walkie-talkies. Like most
people, they live in, and want to stay in that little river in Egypt we refer
to as denial (the Nile).
Now, there are a
lot of different types of organizations out there. Your lll%’ers, your State Defense force (not
all States have this option) Oath Keepers, Local groups and your State Militia
just to name a few. There are others out
there as well as websites that claim they will put you in touch with groups in
your area that you can find out there.
One such website would be WRAMSITE.com
(Well Regulated American Militia) although I am not very fond of this site for
personal reasons if you join there to get connected to a local group and avoid
getting too involved there you should
do well.
What I have found
in my search was that there is a very broad spectrum of people, attitudes,
beliefs, ideologies and skill sets. In
most, organizational skills and forethought are not within the forefront of the
loosely organized and often very opinionated small groups. Each has their benefits and it is not a “one
size fits all” kind of movement (for lack of a better term) so don’t jump in
blindly. Most, if not all, claim to be
based on the military unit structure and even have some members with prior
military backgrounds. Others are just
loose bands of like-minded people trying to learn from other members of the
group things they didn’t know that will help them in their journey to become
better prepared for a life they know is very different than it was, and is
about to get exponentially worse. It is
up to you to decide which type of group is best for you and your
situation. You will find that the people
contained in each “organization” just like in life, are very diverse and
different so the personalities within the group should be just as big of a
priority in your choice as their beliefs and their mission statement, though I
have also found the a “mission statement” is often more for show than for “GO”. Though there are exceptions to that as well.
The group that I
chose I have been with for two years.
There is a constant flow of people both in and out. This group is large and encompasses small
groups (platoons) throughout the state.
There are a lot of members with prior service from the Vietnam conflict
to the recent stuff going down in the Middle East. The training is often disorganized and repetitive. However with patience, I have found that the
information gleaned will be, or is, very useful. It can be confusing as these people want to
train as though they are a fighting force but they are not. The command is firmly in the “defensive”
mode. They want nothing to do at all
with taking a pro-active stance or an aggressive posture. The command structure makes constant statements
to the effect that the People of the Nation are being told that the Militia are
“terrorists” and are anti-Government and that they should be afraid of us. When the actual truth is the complete
opposite, the Militia is here to help the civilian population in need and in
fact does so all the time. Even when not
called upon to act, they do. Yet, when
they are asked to embark on a public relations campaign such as a blood drive
or other charity event in the public eye to alleviate or combat that stigma
they balk. Their fear of reprisal from
the government for doing nothing wrong is too great of a burden for them to
even consider. So they stay in the shadows
and continue to question why they are losing the P.R. battle. People who think like that will never fight
for you or your family. They will run
and hide leaving you and yours to defend yourselves from the inevitable.
So, in conclusion, even with a good bunch of
guys/gals in your “organization”, you cannot expect too much assistance when
push comes to shove. They are often spread too far and too thin. The time it will take them to muster in an
emergent situation could be days rather than hours or minutes. You would be better served calling the police
if they have not yet become the overt enemy. As a defensive force in pockets, I am still
not convinced of the effectiveness and/or the willingness they possess to
really get involved. Most of what I have
seen is the lack of resolve and the willingness to admit that the fight to come
is inevitable, not if, but when. However,
the knowledge that can be obtained from getting involved is incredible and very
much worth the effort it will take to gain it.
That effort will undoubtedly take time, expenditure of funds for
equipment and lots of gas and travel time. It can also be a great deal of fun
if you have the right people involved with you. So, to answer the opening
question, while I have had a very limited exposure to these groups, some are
obviously better than others depending on their intended purpose while others
act the part and are too timid to be useful.
The bottom line I guess is that unless your group is well trained and located
within a ten mile radius of you with ample communications, you are really no
better off than you were before joining with the exception of the knowledge you
have picked up along the way. To expect
anything more from the experience could get you in more trouble than you had
before you started. The following is a
good video. It will give you a little
different insight as to a Pastors viewpoint.
The video is courtesy of Viking preparedness on youtube.
Monday, June 1, 2015
Taken from Zero hedge with all credit to go there.
Five Reasons Why America Is Done
That's done. As in baked, cooked, finis.
Let's just look at the charges and specifications of late, shall we?
- Big US and Global Banks have admitted (that is, have been convicted) of multiple criminal offenses over the last several years. A partial list can be found here; let me remind everyone that an ordinary person who commits three felonies, even if some of them are very minor in comparison to any of the listed ones here in impact and they take place over a period of decades, goes away for life under long-existing three strikes laws. All four of the banks listed in that dissent have three or more "convictions" and thus all of them should be dissolved as they are obviously incapable of modifying their behavior. Nonetheless literally tens of millions of Americans and American corporations not only refuse to stand and demand that these charters be revoked they voluntarily do business with one or more of these firms!
- We have a medical and insurance industry in this country that routinely, on a daily basis, engages in behavior that can easily be described as meeting the criteria for fraud, bid-rigging, racketeering and routinely uses the threat of both bankruptcy and violence by government goons to get what it wants. This "industry" routinely, for example, bills for things they didn't actually do, sends people bills for hundreds or thousands of dollars for someone sticking their head in a door and saying "Hello", allows "off-plan" doctors to treat people without their consent exposing them to thousands (or tens of thousands!) in unauthorized charges and then enforces those "charges", takes drugs off the market that they produce so that the only remaining options are those made by the same company but are under patent and more. The single most-common cause of bankruptcy in this country is medical debt incurred as a direct result of these practices and these practices are where the so-called "need" for Obamacare, that is now resulting in demands for 50% premium hikes in some markets for the next year, came from. Yet we, as a nation and as a people, routinely consent to this crap and allow these corporations, institutions and individuals to continue their outrageous acts of pillagedaily.
- We have a former Secretary of State who now wants to be President but while Secretary of State her private family foundation took tens of millions of dollars in donations from foreign governments that were, at the same time, lobbying the very State Department she was in charge of for permission to buy over a hundred billion dollars worth of weapons. How this fails to qualify as a federal crime is beyond me given that a foreign agent is unable to buy a Senator lunch. Irrespective of whether this leads to indictments it is outrageous that such a person can be considered as fit to be President by anyone irrespective of party or other affiliation; that any material percentage of our voting population would cast a vote for such a person proves beyond any doubt that the majority of voters in this country are literally suicidal.
- We have law enforcement agencies that actually claim in court through filed, sworn documents that when they throw a bomb into a baby's crib as they attempt to raid a house and the person they are seeking isn't there (because they didn't bother to confirm he was there), leading to the infant being critically injured, that it is the infant's fault that its face was blown off because it failed to move out of the way of said thrown bomb while it was sleeping in its crib. In other words we, as a nation, sit silently while government agencies claim the right to blow the face off innocent infants because they are too lazy to bother with ordinary police work. We could indict the government goons who refuse to wait for the person they want to arrest to depart wherever they are and thus make it possible for the police to arrest them without grievously injuring innocent children who had exactly nothing to do with the acts the accused is alleged of committing, but instead we allow innocent children to be grievously injured or killed due to the laziness and malfeasance of these so-called "boys in blue" and even allow to go unchallenged claims that said goons are there to "protect and serve" the public!
- We have entire legislatures that engage with lobbyists to let them write and vote on laws they then rubber stamp. When caught by the press (good work, by the way) the members of the press who catch them are literally thrown out of a hotel they paid to stay at by men with firearms who are in fact off-duty cops -- cops that, I remind you, draw their salaries directly and indirectly from that same legislature!
I could go on, but why?
Until and unless we at least resolve all five of the above, and everyone involved wears an orange jumpsuit and has their corporate and institutional edifices closed down with the ill-gotten gains disbursed back to their victims we are, as a nation, DONE.
And more to the point we have all collectively consented as well.
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Jade Helm
I am at a loss for words.
With the advent of the JADE HELM 15 exercises. That were supposed to be taking place in
eight states in the southwest and include California, Texas, Oklahoma, Utah,
Colorado, Nevada, Arizona and New
Mexico, but had soon morphed to include all of the southern states and from
coast to coast and as far north as Kentucky in the east and Oregon and Wyoming
in the west. The Military admits to
including all branches of the service with emphasis being placed on all the special
operations teams (S*E*A*L teams, Delta, Airborne, etc.). Also included is the United Nations,
Multinational force, all the alphabet agencies including FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA,
TSA and FEMA as well as all local law enforcement agencies and their SWAT ( or special
operations) Teams. This “exercise” was
supposed to take place in the original eight states starting in July, but this
too was changed to include the month of June, although, there have been
exercises in Miami, Tampa, North and South Carolina as early as April, and
other states even earlier with exercises taking place in Michigan and other
states in March. There have been massive
equipment movements both on rail and over the highways taking place all over
the Country, this also includes the movement of U.N. vehicles of all shapes and
sizes including (but not limited to) tanks, apc’s and Mraps. There has also been video and stills of resettlement
and disarmament vehicles, also U.N. Could this all be part of the U.N small arms treaty
signed by John Kerry (Sec-state) and Barry Soetorro (President)? I don’t know.
No one really does except maybe the Rothschild’s, or whoever is pulling
the strings of the puppet government we all now seem to be subjects of. This bothers me for several reasons. The first of which, it is a blatant violation
of the posse comitatus act, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1251/MR1251.AppD.pdf
If you are a fan of Wikipedia, you can use this link
here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
The second is, there is no precedent. This has never been done before on such a
large scale out in the “Public Domain” ever in the history of this
Country. This is why we set up federal
reservations for the military to train and play with their toys. On top of all of this and in further
violation of the afore mentioned act, the third I.D. (Infantry Division) has
been assigned to NORTHCOM (Northern Operations Command) and this assignment
will be fulfilled in October of this year directly following this “exercise.” This will be a permanent assignment for this
battle hardened infantry unit and it is INSIDE the homeland!! They are to be used for civil disobedience
and law enforcement. This is very scary
indeed. The military was never intended
to be a “standing army” on our shores unless it was required to repel an
invasion. Which is also why we have the
Constitutionally protected un-organized Militia, to protect the homeland. This is covered in the second amendment to
the Constitution, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment
(this link will give you the whole document if you need it). And, in case you were wondering about the “un-organized
Militia.” Depending on the state in
which you are domiciled, the Constitution for the United States and your
State Constitution provides the definition.
In most (if not all) cases, it reads like this; “all able-bodied Citizens
between the ages of 17 and 45 are
members of the (un-organized) Militia.”
So, I guess my
question, and the reason I am writing today is very simply WHY? For that question I have no answer. One can spend countless hours scouring the
internet, listening to talk radio (Steve Quayle, Hagman and Hagman, Rush
Limbaugh and others.) as well as watching the lame-stream-media (which are not
really saying anything about it like it doesn’t even exist) and not come up
with a sufficient answer to that question.
All the research will just lead to more questions. Here is a couple of videos from Dr. William
Mount that really had me scratching my head (I cannot verify, nor do I necessarily
agree with what he says here):
There are others from him that you might find interesting. From Alex Jones and infowars to Glenn Beck,
all of the alternative media is all over this including OldMarine1 on youtube: .
I guess what I am trying to say is pay attention. Keep your head on a swivel. Start putting some food stuffs and water
away. Carry if you can and do your best
to stay out of the mayhem
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)